FREE shipping on qualifying orders when you spend or more. All prices ex. VAT. Enjoy hassle-free delivery, fulfilled by our EU subsidiary. Backed by our 50 State Delivery Guarantee. Regional distributors also available. Sorry, we are unable to accept orders from or ship to .

It looks like you are using an unsupported browser. You can still place orders by emailing us on info@ossila.com, but you may experience issues browsing our website. Please consider upgrading to a modern browser for better security and an improved browsing experience.

Issues with Colony Counting

Laminar Flow Hood vs Glove Box

Colony counters are an important part of the microbiological laboratory. They play an essential role in counting bacterial and fungal colonies on agar plates. While colony counters enhance efficiency and precision, they can present challenges impacting the accuracy and workflow of the experiments. Understanding common issues of colony counters and how to solve them aids in reliable results.

Impact of errors in colony counting


Unlike machines, humans have limitations in attention, perception, memory and logical reasoning. Opting for manual colony counting is subjective and susceptible to human error, therefore, using an automatic colony counter is recommended. Errors in colony counting can result in unreliable data. This can make it challenging to compare experiments within the same laboratory or even across different research facilities. For example, if three scientists count the colonies on the same plate and get different results, the margin of error can be too large. As high standard deviation reduces the statistical significance of the data, it presents a challenge on drawing a conclusion. Statistical significance is an important part of microbiological research and unreliable results from colony counting may interfere with publishing the findings.

Challenges in counting microbial colonies


Counting microbial colonies in a sample or on a filter comes with several challenges. Overlapping colonies can hinder accurate counting, as colonies close to each other can merge and then be counted as a single unit. Colonies at the edge of the plate can pose difficulties. While they are visible to the human eye, the software might not pick them up which leads to undercounting. Additionally, background noise and contamination, such as air bubbles, debris or other artifacts, can interfere colony recognition. If the sample consists of several microbial species, the variations in colony size, shape and colour may complicate the counting process. It is essential to standardize the criteria before counting and use reliable method to ensure accurate results.

Solutions to improve inaccuracies

  • Serial dilution: Diluting the initial sample will reduce overcrowding and the number of overlapping colonies.
  • Plate rotation and multiple counting: Rotating plates and performing multiple counts will ensure all colonies are accounted for.
  • Threshold and image analysis: Using image analysis software will help differentiate true colonies from background noise.
  • Standardized criteria: Establishing clear counting criteria improves consistency across different samples and operators.

Common issues and solutions in colony counting


Inaccurate colony counts

One of the most common issues with colony counters is inaccurate counting. This can lead to unreliable data and affect the outcome of the experiment. Factors that contribute to this are uneven lighting, user fatigue and overlapping colonies. Poor lighting can make it difficult to distinguish between colonies and background noise, resulting in undercounting or overcounting. When a researcher decides to use manual counting instead of an automatic counter, the process is prone to errors such as eye strain or fatigue. Lastly, if the sample is too concentrated, colonies may grow closely together. As such, they may be counted as a single unit, leading to undercounting.

How to fix it

  • Ensure that you are using an LED or fluorescent lighting to enhance the contrast.
  • Use an automatic counter with digital imaging software to improve accuracy and reduce human error.
  • Adjust the sensitivity settings in digital counters to differentiate closely spaced colonies.
  • If performing manual counting, take breaks to reduce eye fatigue and use a grid overlay to separate clusters.

Malfunctioning digital displays or software issues

Some colony counters have a digital display or a software for automated counting. When these malfunction, it can impact the counting from slowing down the workflow to introducing inaccuracies. Commonly these can present in three different ways. Firstly, the screen can be frozen or unresponsive. Secondly, the colony counting software can close unexpectedly or not load the images correctly. Thirdly, automated systems may not recognise colonies from background noise.

How to fix it

  • Restart the colony counter or refresh the system.
  • Check for software updates, as outdated programs may cause glitches.
  • Adjust the contrast and sensitivity settings in the software to enhance colony detection.
  • If problems persist, reinstall the software or contact the manufacturer for support.

Calibration problems

Colony counters that have been poorly calibrated can lead to discrepancies in results. This makes it difficult to keep consistency across experiments. Calibration issues may arise when the device has been moved or adjusted, which can shift the alignment. In some cases, the performance of the colony counter can be affected by changes in temperature and humidity. When you receive your counter, it is important to check the manual as some devices need to be recalibrated once in a while.

How to fix it

  • Follow the manufacturer's guidelines for recalibrating your counter regularly.
  • Use standardized test plates to verify accuracy before each use.
  • Avoid moving the device frequently to maintain stability.
  • If your counter is still inaccurate, contact technical support for professional recalibration.

Contamination and hygiene issues

Microbiological laboratories require a sterile environment. Similarly, if the colony counter is not kept clean, it can lead to contamination, affecting the results. Common contamination sources include residual samples, dirty lens or plate surface, and inadequate cleaning protocols.

How to fix it

  • Wipe the counting surface with a disinfectant after each use.
  • Regularly clean the lens or camera on digital colony counters to maintain image clarity.
  • Implement a strict lab protocol for handling agar plates to prevent accidental sample contamination.
  • Store the device in a clean, dust-free environment when not in use.

Learn More


Microbiological Culture Colony Counting: Method, Tips & Manual vs Automated

Colony counting is a key technique used in microbiology, offering critical insights into microbial populations in various scientific and industrial fields. This method allows researchers and professionals to estimate the number of microbes in a sample. It is the easiest and most common way to estimate the number of cells in a sample.

Read more...
Bacteria, Viruses and Fungi: What's the Difference? Ames Test

Ames test is a biological assay widely used for the identification and evaluation of mutagenic potential in chemical compounds. Using bacteria, this test examines whether a specific chemical has the potential to cause mutations in DNA of the organism being tested. Mutations represent changes in the genetic makeup of the organism. They can lead to various biological consequences, including carcinogenesis. As such, Ames test aims to determine which chemicals possess mutagenic activity. This is done by observing whether they trigger mutations in bacterial samples.

Read more...

Contributors


Written by

Linda Vidova

Scientific Writer

Return to the top